SAVE THE WOMENS LIBRARY CAMPAIGN UPDATE

CAMPAIGN CALLS FOR REOPENING OF THE BIDDING PROCESS TO

SAVE THE WOMEN’S LIBRARY

The campaign to save The Women’s Library from closure and relocation today held a lively demonstration outside the Holloway Road campus of London Met, where a selection panel was meeting inside to make recommendations on LSE’s bid to take over The Women’s Library collection and move it into its own library.
The selection panel, set up by Dr Paul Bowler, Deputy Vice Chancellor of London Met, to decide the fate of The Women’s Library, met this afternoon to decide whether to allow its collection of material to be moved to the LSE.


The panel agreed to meet representatives from the campaign before their meeting, but the panel was unwilling to inform us of the outcome of their deliberations before they are ratified at the next London Met Board of Governors meeting on 27th September.

If the decision to move the collection to the LSE were allowed to stand, it would mean the effective closure of The Women’s Library, with the loss of the purpose- built building in Old Castle Street, E1, which was opened only ten years ago with the aid of £4 million from the Heritage Lottery Fund.

Addressing the panel on behalf of the Save the Women’s Library Campaign, its members argued that it is imperative that the library remains its current building with its current staff. They lobbied the panel to re-open the bidding process so that the LSE and any other interested institutions could resubmit more acceptable proposals, on the grounds that:

• Moving the collection to the new LSE site would change it from a living to a dead collection, with a loss of accessibility for its local, national and international community of users.

• The bidding process has not been transparent and has been rushed through without proper consultation.

• It has recently come to light that London Met has misled stakeholders, Women’s Library staff, readers and donors, by initially claiming that it would be handed over as a package, which would keep the building, collection and staff together. However London Met later refused to include the building as part of the package unless it was leased for prohibitively high rents.

• In general the bidding process appears to not fulfil the university’s legal obligation towards transparency and equal opportunities.

In the light of this, the campaign fears that it is left with no alternative but to explore the legal ramifications of London Met’s lack of transparency and consultation with stakeholders, and its failure to uphold its equal opportunity responsibilities.

Help save The Women's Library

 ... "Because well behaved women rarely make history."

The Women's Library is the most extensive women's history collection in the UK. It is currently housed in a purpose-built building in East London, which campaigners fought hard to have built to home the collection in 2002. Over the past 10 years it has grown from strength-to-strength and now functions as a cultural centre hosting events, exhibitions, talks and provides local community groups and organisations a space to hire. Its staff have worked tirelessly to build and draw new audiences to the materials which have been gathered over the past 86 years and which continue to be. The building is vibrant and accessible, a cultural centre and a focal point for activism - it is truly the kind of home that women's history, so often forgotten about, deserves. However, this cultural centre is now under threat.

London Metropolitan University, the current custodians of the library, have decided that they can no longer run the collection, and have opened the bidding process for a new institution to take over the running of the library. However, they have not made the retention of its East London home an essential part of the selection criteria, and this means that the institution that takes over the running of the collection could move it to a much less accessible location, destroying all of the community links to the collection which have been built over the last 10 years. Staff at the library are clear that this is not what they want to happen, and is not what is best for the continuation of such an important collection.

The following is a list of bidders for the library, announced recently:

• Senate House, University of London (Christine Wise, Historic Collections and Head of Special Collections: christine.wise@london.ac.uk)
• Manchester City Council (libraries@manchester.gov.uk)
• London School of Economics, University of London (Elizabeth Chapman, Director of Library Services:e.chapman@lse.ac.uk )
• Warwick University (Robin Green, Librarian: robin.green@warwick.ac.uk )
• University of York (Stephen Town, Director of Information and University Librarian:stephen.town@york.ac.uk)

We're asking feminists, historians (and anyone else!) connected to these institutions – be you students, alumni or staff – to write to your head of library services to ask that they consider including the retention of the building as part of their bid. You can use the example letter below as a starting point, but personalised letters are best, so try to include your connection to the institution, and any personal comments that you might have. If you receive a response, please forward it to savetwl86@gmail.com.

To Whom it May Concern,

I am writing with regards to your institution's bid to take over custodianship of The Women's Library collection.

The “Save The Women's Library” Campaign was initiated by staff, users and supporters of The Women's Library when it became clear that London Metropolitan University had made the decision to divest custodianship of the collection to another institution. The aims of the campaign have been as follows: to keep the collection intact; to retain its expert staff; and to remain in the dedicated building in East London where it has been housed since 2002. The campaign are delighted that a number of bids for the collection, including your own, mean that the collection is highly likely to remain in tact. However, we are very concerned that London Metropolitan University have not made the retention of the dedicated building an essential part of the bid.

The collection currently housed in a purpose-built building in East London, which campaigners fought hard to have built to home the collection in 2002. Over the past 10 years it has grown from strength-to-strength and now functions as a cultural centre hosting events, exhibitions, talks and provides local community groups and organisations a space to hire. Its staff have worked tirelessly to build and draw new audiences to the materials which have been gathered over the past 86 years and which continue to be. The building is vibrant and accessible, a cultural centre and a focal point for activism - it is truly the kind of home that women's history, so often forgotten about, deserves. In the run-up to a major suffrage anniversary in 2018, The Women’s Library should be looking to thrive, not just survive. Staying in its building, near its audiences, with its staff, offers a sound basis for doing this.

I am therefore writing to encourage you to consider the retention of the building as part of your institution's bid for the collection. I am sure that staff at the Library would be happy to speak with you personally about why they feel the retention of the building is so important.

I look forward to receiving your response.

Yours faithfully,

RHUL Women Against Cuts @ Demo2012

On the 21^st of November, students will once again march in London to protest at education cuts and reforms. Royal Holloway Feminism Society will be marching against the devastating impact of this government's education policy – and of wider austerity measures - on women.

Research has shown that women will bear the brunt of government cuts, with a report finding that 73% of the savings proposed in the 2011 budget will come from women. Education reforms will have a number specific negative effects on women students. The cutting of Educational Maintenance Allowance and the introduction of fees for further education for students over the age of 24 will negatively impact women who wish to return to education, for example after having children. The gender pay gap means that women will take longer to repay loans taken out for further and higher education. The most drastic cuts to higher education funding have been made to the arts and humanities, subjects which are studied by greater numbers of women than men. Student parents will be particularly hard hit: the increase in fees, combined with cuts to benefits, will seriously affect mothers in education – the NUS Women's Campaign found that 78% of student parents claimed some kind of benefit in order for them to be able to study. There is concern that reductions in government funding to higher education institutes may lead to institutions making savings by services, such as student welfare services and childcare facilities, which are relied upon by student parents. Wider cuts to public services will leave women “filling the gaps” in caring for children and relatives, leaving them much less able to pursue education.

We'll be marching on November 21^st – will you?

The Telegraph: Professor hopes equal pay case will pave way for

Original Article by By Victoria Ward 7:00AM BST 04 Jun 2011

"A leading university has introduced a pay scale for professors in a bid to banish gender inequality after a landmark employment tribunal which could set a precedent for equal pay across the country.

Royal Holloway, University of London, agreed a settlement with Liz Schafer, a drama and theatre studies professor who took legal action over its “scandalous” professorial pay gaps.

The case is expected to have legal ramifications for scores of higher education establishments which do not have equal pay structures in place.

Prof Schafer, 51, from Virginia Water, Surrey, told the Daily Telegraph: “As a result of this case all universities which don’t have a system need to get a system very quickly or there will be a whole queue of female professors waiting to take them to a tribunal.”

Prof Schafer launched legal proceedings after discovering that regardless of her eminence within her field of work and her publication record, she had been consistently under rewarded in comparison to her male peers.

She was represented by the University and College Union which said Royal Holloway’s pay gap between male and female professors was amongst the highest in the country."